Search results

Just a gentle reminder that Army.ca's owner has shared rules re: how to carry out political discussion on the threads. https://army.ca/forums/threads/how-to-engage-in-political-discourse-on-army-ca.127903/ An excerpt from the rules .... I know everyone is passionate no matter what side they're...

Just a gentle reminder that Army.ca's owner has shared rules re: how to carry out political discussion on the threads. https://army.ca/forums/threads/how-to-engage-in-political-discourse-on-army-ca.127903/ An excerpt from the rules .... I know everyone is passionate no matter what side they're...

Just a gentle reminder that Army.ca's owner has shared rules re: how to carry out political discussion on the threads. https://army.ca/forums/threads/how-to-engage-in-political-discourse-on-army-ca.127903/ An excerpt from the rules .... I know everyone is passionate no matter what side they're...

Oh yeah. As I've said elsewhere, at least part of both JT & PP (and their most fervent fan bois) are champing at the bit from the white-hot hate they have for each other, thinking how much of a threat the other is to Canada.... ... or maybe face an easier-for-Canada-to-take face at the head...

Fixed that for you based on how many pro-Team-Red folks (mostly, but not all, commentariat who used to work for federal and/or provincial Red teams) are talking out loud about, "it's time to go, buddy."

And to keep other legacy family businesses/endeavours running.

Ah, but you're harkening back to days when political discourse, even between rivals, was civil - or at least more civil than it is now. Maybe not quite that far, but for SURE like he's hanging on waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too tightly to what he considers a possible liferaft tactic.

Some of the commentariat (including some pro-Team-Red members) are using the word "panicked".

Planting this here to fertilize the "how do we get mo' babies?" discussion - one country's proposed approach .... "Could a $70,000 Baby Bonus Solve South Korea’s Fertility Crisis?" Article also archived here if earlier link doesn't work for you.

https://phys.org/news/2024-05-military-affects-medical-societal-insights.html Zero idea if this can be applied/seen in the CF medical system, but interesting how these guys suggest the dynamics may transfer to civilian settings - this from the study ... ... and this from the story ... Study...

Not the same thing at all - can you link to the policy resolution for that one? ;) Agreed, and agreed.

Latest from Angus Reid & Co. on religion & voting intentions .... https://angusreid.org/religion-and-vote/ And here's the overall breakdown .... On how this one was done .... Also attached as PDF in case link doesn't work for you.

More in a similar vein here https://lithub.com/king-charles-new-royal-portrait-as-romantasy-covers/

Just like Ontario NDP policy had always been "we're putting in public auto insurance" and "we won't break into negotiated contracts" - until they didn't and did (respectively) - or the federal Liberals' policy on going for a new way of electing folks - until they didn't? ;) Odd are Team Blue'll...

Official portrait's out (source) ... ... and it's proving to be a wee bit ... controversial ... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/king-charles-iii-portrait-jonathan-yeo-bright-red-gets-mixed-reviews/...

I agree that a resolution this clear shows a good level of clarity re: what the assembled Team Blue party members wanted (or were at least OK with) when the resolution was adpoted. Also, as mentioned elsewhere in these parts, I think Team Blue knows this isn't an overall winner because if they...

As mentioned before, here's what he said before the convention where the resolution was passed (source) ... That said, as others have said, it's not likely to come up, but we'll have to see.

Maybe more than just IT support .... https://breakingdefense.com/2024/05/estonia-seriously-discussing-sending-troops-to-rear-jobs-in-ukraine-official/ https://ca.news.yahoo.com/nato-member-estonia-seriously-discussing-044255127.html ... although there is a bit of ... clarification via EST & some...

Like different voting systems that would lead to nobody getting majorities, I'd bet my loonie on none of the parties wanting to change the laws/rules to loose control of nomination processes, even if they would become more secure, so to speak. Who wants to give away power?

Need this too :(