Without that support you will not have serviceable vehicles. So I will argue that support personal, repair equipment and a reliable spare parts system is as important to this debate as are the sensors and weapons the vehicles should have.
Never underestimate the abilty of the people you want to cut to be able to dodge the axe. In their mind their whole job is to stay employed and are good at it. The frontliners are to busy doing their job to see the axe.
Part of the current bloat was the hamfisted way the CPC did "Workforce adjustment" We lost our only GIS tech and they left us with another employee that was pure deadweight. That's only one example. A lot of corporate knowledge went out the door and where snatched up by firms that wanted that...
You need vehicles that we can afford in quantity, that are easily maintained and fixed, thanks to our weak support system. A support system that is extremely weak in supporting the Reserves.
We actually need to reduce the number bayonets to bolster our supporting arms and I don't see the Army...
Article in the CDR says Roshel has delivered over a 1,000 vehicles to Ukraine and can currently make 5 a day. They mention significant changes to the first generation to current and more changes as they learn from the conflict. They are also working on a 8x8.
Well might be useful to out source UK Muslim problem to the Hindu/Sikhs. They seem to have figured out how to deal with it in a "Culturally sensitive manner"
Electrical problem at the dock ate 60lbs of zinc in 3 months and then started eating at the hull of a steel boat.
The shipyard here uses a electric cathode under the drydocks to protect them.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.