what would be the comparative costs between laying track or a pipeline to Port Nelson and developing the harbour as opposed to having to build a new natural gas line clear through to the east coast with all the political complications of crossing through Quebec?
a standard rail car holds 700 barrels of oil. So a unit train of 100 cars would run 70,000 barrels per train. Why not twin the track sufficiently to permit efficient passing and just run unit trains for the oil and stay with Moose. for the gas
this summarizes the entire problem. If you start from that point in the discussion, maybe it is possible to find a solution. Pardon my interjection into what is proving an interesting debate. I will go back to standby
and to the general populace who feasted upon his bits of wisdom and appreciated his saying what we were too tongue-tied to utter ourselves but what we believed. RIP
but think of all the carbon emissions that will cease. Abandoned industrial complexes are totally green, 600 cars no longer burning fuel heading for work every day, boats and seadoos being left in the garage: what's not to like
You left out the C7. And the operating specs for both it and by extension the CC115 were a lot different for the army than they were for the air force. The Caribou was in and out of strips that were less than 1000 ft. Definitely not 280 specifications but then again the price difference and...
there are dozens of sites globally that have a flood gauge that has been there for centuries. The circular openings in one of the bridges in Rome being one case in point. So floods are nothing new. The Seychelles were predicted to disappear under the Indian Ocean in the next few years but...
what is not to like. Been running naval vessels and the like for decades now with no disasters and really, a barge is nothing more than a ship with no means of self-propulsion. Probably cheaper to build than a land based structure
and it should be more than sufficient cause for Singh to grow a pair . It might even help him hold on to a couple of seats that he will otherwise lose.
that is what happens when you start relying on AI. Simple example but it demonstrates very clearly the weaknesses of relying on a machine to make decisions.
The best enhancement that they have added to TV in the last 2 decades is the mute button. Although having the channel select close at hand rather than having to get up means instantaneous results rather than having to listen for 20 seconds on the way to the tube.
why should you get a pass? If they are lying through their teeth for sure but if it is just the tone or presentation, we really should be able to look beyond it and consider what it is they are actually saying
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.