CDN Aviator said:Sea pay is a fixed rate. If you are in a position in receipt of sea duty allowance, you get paid the prescribed rate regardless of the number of days actualy spent at sea.
I see. Thanks for clearing that up, CDN Aviator!
CDN Aviator said:Sea pay is a fixed rate. If you are in a position in receipt of sea duty allowance, you get paid the prescribed rate regardless of the number of days actualy spent at sea.
CDN Aviator said:Sea pay is a fixed rate. If you are in a position in receipt of sea duty allowance, you get paid the prescribed rate regardless of the number of days actualy spent at sea.
N. McKay said:But does the rate not increase in the long term, i.e. based on the number of years in a seagoing position?
CDN Aviator said:If 60-120 days at sea per year is too much, i'm currious as to what you expectations of being in the Navy were ?
Comahawk said:As stated, the situation between when I joined and where I am now has drastically changed.
Ex-Dragoon said:There are quite a few MS and below that surpass that figure every year.
Comahawk said:Thank you for the information Lex, it is nice to get someone with first hand experience to give a rough idea what the job is like. Given this information, I think I will be initiating a change to become a Log Officer, hopefully I can stay as a naval Log O at least.
Pusser said:MARS officers can expect five to eight.
Container said:Ive looked at CEOTP (I have like three courses left) for MARS a few times. And take this for what its worth- but if I was joining the Navy I would want to be at sea. Isnt that the allure?
Of course thats easy to say when I dont have to 'splain to the wife that Im leaving again.
Oldgateboatdriver said:Hate to say this but, you guys (and galls?) are complaining for nothing.
In the 70's and early 80's, cold war period before the wall fell, we averaged 220 to 230 days at sea per year with the old steamers - and that was with budget cut backs.